WHEN
BREED SHOULD BE IGNORED
Can
a law that bans or restricts ownership of specific breeds of
dogscalled a breed-specific lawprotect
the members of your community from dog attacks? According to
experts, the answer is no.
Why?
Popular breeds come and go. When ownership of one breed of dog
is outlawed, those who want a dangerous dog simply turn to another
breed. The Doberman pinscherknown as the dangerous dog breed
of the 1970swas replaced in popularity by the pit bull in
the 80s and the rottweiler in the 90s.
Breed-specific
laws require that someone be able to prove that a specific dog
is a member, or a mix, of that breednot always an easy task.
Boxers and bulldogs, for instance, may be mistaken for pit bulls.
Any medium-large sized black and tan dog with a long tail may
be mistakenly labeled as a German shepherd.
Breed-specific
legislation doesnt acknowledge the fact that a dog of any
breed can become dangerous. The law should protect your community
from any such dog.
Breed-specific
laws are difficult, costly, and sometimes impossible to enforce.
Its one thing to require that every rottweiler in your community
be muzzled whenever outside of the home; its another to
fund and support adequate animal control staff to ensure that
this happens.
In
1987 the Cincinnati City Council banned all pit bulls within the
city after a series of severe maulings and one human fatality
involving the dogs. The ban was passed even though the state of
Ohio and the city of Cincinnati already had statutes that allowed
authorities to seize any dog known to have injured or killed a
person or another dog. Nearly ten years later, the councils
law committee recommended that the ban be repealed, saying that
it was unnecessary. The council recommended that pit bulls be
handled like any other dogs and that owners be prosecuted only
when the dogs were unrestrained or exhibited dangerous behavior.
It made this recommendation in part due to the cost of enforcement.
Confiscated dogs spent up to five months at the citys contracted
shelter while the cases against the dogs owners were being
litigated. Many of the confiscated dogs were family companions
with no history of aggression.
Legislation
that restricts breeds may actually create a population of dangerous
dogs within your community. When a community imposes strict regulations
on a specific breed of dog, owners of those dogs may end up chaining
or caging the dogs for long periods of time. Dogs so chained or
caged can be so desperate for activity that they become uncontrollable
should they escape. Restricted dogs often receive little veterinary
care because it is difficult for their owners to transport them
to a veterinary facility without violating restrictions. Most
importantly, restricted dogs who dont get to experience
normal opportunities for socialization and training will undoubtedly
act in an unpredictable fashion when exposed to the real world.
The
HSUS advocates laws that penalize the owners of dogs, not the
dogs themselves, for dangerous behavior.
Source:
Humane Society of the United States
|